Senior School Debating

26th February 2013

This year saw the successful launch of the Senior School Debating competition. The event saw two separate inter-house debates: Rothchild-Pearce vs. Mann-Summerville and Thomas Sharman vs Knight Heaths. The students involved rose to the challenge and produced well-researched and thought provoking ideas in response to two fascinating motions.

First up was RP v MS. Rothchild-Pearce proposed the motion, “This House believes there is too much assessment of children in Secondary Education”. Lydia Crosher delivered an erudite, well-considered opening speech that impressed the audience and the judge, Mr Fountain. Lydia was opposed by David Newman, who did a good job presenting the counter-argument. More impressive speeches followed, intersected by a fascinating floor debate that saw many intelligent questions put forward from the audience. The issues were well summarised by both teams, and when it came to the vote there was a majority in favour of the motion.

The second and final debate was Thomas-Sharman’s motion, “This House believes that technology is detrimental to young people”. Beginning with a PowerPoint presentation (!), Oliver Capp provided a very strong and entertaining proposition speech. Thea Barrett came back with an equally good counter-argument, although Kathryn Cutler-McKenzie dazzled the audience and judge with a near-perfect Second Opposition speech. The summary speakers impressed with two neat summations; however, it was the floor debate that really got things going, with excellent comments and responses being fired back and forth. In the end, Knight-Heath deservedly won the battle (especially after some questionable tactics from TS).

My thanks must go to the two teams who did a formidable job of public speaking, which is no easy task in front of one’s peers. I would also like to thank those students who took part in the audience, who were as equally impressive with their mature and intelligent contributions. Of course, debates need a strong chairperson, and both Sean Moore (12TS) and Lauren Smith (12MS) did a fantastic job of maintaining order and timing.

Finally, I would like to thank Mr Fountain for giving up his time and doing a tremendous job of judging the event. His notes and supporting comments really flagged up the strengths of the speakers and summed up the overall quality of the event.

APH


View Images